Skip to content
Breshev EngineeringAURA Engineering Platform

Problem-led engineering routes

Choose the solution page that matches the machine decision.

Each solution starts with a real engineering question, lists the required inputs, shows the output package and points to the smallest appropriate commercial engagement.

High intent

Aerostatic bearing design

Calculate a defined journal, thrust or conical support—or synthesise a candidate from required load, stiffness, flow and envelope.

Open solution →
Specialist geometry

Conical air-bearing design

Resolve coupled radial and axial support in one conical architecture, including adjustable-clearance concepts.

Open solution →
Machine architecture

Air-bearing spindle design

Connect support selection to spindle layout, shaft, tool, loads, operating speed and the next detailed design stage.

Open solution →
System consequence

Gas-bearing rotor dynamics

Carry the defined support state into critical-speed, Campbell, response and stability screening.

Open solution →
Early decision

Feasibility before CAD and CFD

Improve the first geometry and define what detailed simulation or testing must prove before expensive iteration begins.

Open solution →
Unsure?

Start with one requirement

Send machine type, RPM, loads, envelope, gas supply and the decision that must be made.

Request a fit check →

Selection guide

Match the page to the failure mode or decision—not to the AURA brand name.

SituationSolutionCommercial entry
No defensible support geometry exists yetAerostatic or conical bearing designFeasibility Screen
Support choice must fit the full spindle architectureAir-bearing spindle designFeasibility Screen or Pilot
Bearing coefficients exist but machine consequence is unknownGas-bearing rotor dynamicsFeasibility Screen or Evidence Review
CAD/CFD is about to begin with a weak first candidateFeasibility before CAD and CFDFeasibility Screen

Unsure which route fits?

Start with the machine decision, not the software feature.

Request a fit check