Aerostatic bearing design
Calculate a defined journal, thrust or conical support—or synthesise a candidate from required load, stiffness, flow and envelope.
Open solution →Problem-led engineering routes
Each solution starts with a real engineering question, lists the required inputs, shows the output package and points to the smallest appropriate commercial engagement.
Calculate a defined journal, thrust or conical support—or synthesise a candidate from required load, stiffness, flow and envelope.
Open solution →Resolve coupled radial and axial support in one conical architecture, including adjustable-clearance concepts.
Open solution →Connect support selection to spindle layout, shaft, tool, loads, operating speed and the next detailed design stage.
Open solution →Carry the defined support state into critical-speed, Campbell, response and stability screening.
Open solution →Improve the first geometry and define what detailed simulation or testing must prove before expensive iteration begins.
Open solution →Send machine type, RPM, loads, envelope, gas supply and the decision that must be made.
Request a fit check →Selection guide
| Situation | Solution | Commercial entry |
|---|---|---|
| No defensible support geometry exists yet | Aerostatic or conical bearing design | Feasibility Screen |
| Support choice must fit the full spindle architecture | Air-bearing spindle design | Feasibility Screen or Pilot |
| Bearing coefficients exist but machine consequence is unknown | Gas-bearing rotor dynamics | Feasibility Screen or Evidence Review |
| CAD/CFD is about to begin with a weak first candidate | Feasibility before CAD and CFD | Feasibility Screen |
Start with the machine decision, not the software feature.