Breshev Engineering AURA creator
Founder · Engineering systems architect · Researcher

Oleksii Breshev builds physics-based engineering systems from calculation to release decision.

Founder, Breshev Engineering · Creator of AURA Engineering Platform · Gas-Static Bearings · Rotor Dynamics · Engineering Software

Approximately 18 years across mechanical systems, precision engineering, CAD/CAE, simulation, testing and software product development — concentrated into AURA, a working platform for gas-static bearing and high-speed rotor decisions.

Research-to-product position

AURA connects direct calculation and inverse synthesis of gas-static bearings — including adjustable conical supports — to manufacturable spindle geometry, rotor dynamics and release evidence.

Its differentiation is the continuity of the engineering state: requirements, physics, geometry, dynamic response, validation basis and decision authority remain part of one traceable workflow.

Research focus

The work is deliberately integrated: bearing coefficients are not treated as isolated catalogue values, and rotor results are not separated from geometry, operating state or the evidence needed for an engineering decision.

01

Gas-static bearing systems

Direct calculation and inverse synthesis of journal, thrust, conical and combined support configurations.

02

Adjustable conical supports

Geometry, clearance control and load-path behaviour in adjustable non-contact spindle architectures.

03

High-speed spindles and rotors

Support coefficients, critical-speed screening, unbalance response, orbit and stability indicators.

04

Manufacturable geometry

Connecting the physical model to drive, shaft, tool, support and tolerance definitions that can be built.

05

Experiment and validation

Test-state provenance, model–measurement comparison and explicit validation envelopes.

06

Evidence-gated software

Separating a physical screening result from the authority to freeze, release or attribute field behaviour.

One connected engineering chain

Theory
Computation
Geometry
Experiment
Product
Evidence

Selected research and technical work

Peer-reviewed research is separated from independently published technical work so that publication status and claim authority remain clear.

Peer-reviewed research

Study of the dynamics of spindle shaft on gas-static bearings

Problems of Friction and Wear · 2024 · gas-static supports and spindle-shaft dynamic behaviour.

Structural analysis and design approaches for a non-contact rotational drive

Peer-reviewed engineering research · 2024.

DOI

Methodology for designing a non-contact drive system

Peer-reviewed engineering research · 2025.

DOI
Technical publications

A Balancing Result Is Not Plane-Free

Independent technical article on tolerance, measurement and correction planes; machine capability; assembly transfer; and release authority. Not presented as peer reviewed.

Zenodo

AURA Engineering Platform

Public methodology and product record for gas-static bearing synthesis, rotor workflows and evidence-gated decisions.

Zenodo

Current research questions

State transfer

What can a warm or factory-test result prove after clearance, thermal state and boundary conditions change?

Coefficient authority

How should bearing stiffness and damping provenance travel into rotor-dynamic and release decisions?

Manufacturing transfer

How do tolerances, balance planes and assembly state alter the authority of a component-level result?

Open validation surface

The proprietary solver remains closed. The public surface makes methodology, reference cases, evidence status and decision boundaries inspectable through DOI records and a versioned validation registry.

Collaboration formats

One-case benchmark

Compare one defined bearing or rotor case with assumptions and provenance recorded.

Spindle acceptance map

Translate requirements, operating state and measurement evidence into explicit acceptance boundaries.

Test-to-model validation

Align configurations and conditions, compare results and identify the next highest-value test.

Measurement evidence annex

Preserve apparatus, repeatability, planes, configuration and what the result is allowed to support.

API or workflow integration

Connect a controlled engineering calculation or evidence object to an internal toolchain through a scoped interface.

Joint technical work

Develop a benchmark, application note or validation case with clear authorship and claim boundaries.

Research · product · collaboration

Bring one defined engineering question

Machine type, speed range, support architecture, available geometry and the decision the evidence must support are enough to start a focused technical conversation.