What the CFD result resolves
- Pressure distribution
- Velocity direction and local gradients
- Resolved film-domain behaviour
- Flow features that need deeper review
Public sample · CFD verification package
From a selected gas-bearing candidate to a resolved pressure and velocity field.
This sample shows how a CFD verification result can be structured after AURA has selected the geometry and defined the verification question.
5° sectorExpanded by rotational symmetry.
30 µm gas filmResolved local flow domain.
6 → 1 bar(a)Supply-to-ambient pressure basis.
293.15 KDocumented sample temperature.
Result views
Pressure distribution and pressure-driven radial flow.
The full field view and local crops show the pressure decay through the resolved gas film and the velocity direction used in the verification interpretation.
Verification questions
The package connects the field result to an engineering decision.
What is compared
- Operating pressure basis
- Integrated support reaction
- Flow or leakage result
- Consistency with the screened candidate
What the package recommends
- Accept the selected state
- Refine geometry or boundary conditions
- Advance to supplier or prototype work
- Define the validation or test question
Sample package structure
Five sections keep the CFD result reviewable.
Model basis
Geometry, gas film, symmetry, material state and boundary conditions.
Numerical setup
Solver route, mesh strategy, convergence record and result extraction.
Field results
Pressure, velocity, flow and integrated reactions.
AURA comparison
Residuals and interpretation against the analytical screen.
Recommendation
Accept, refine or define the next proof.
Evidence role:This public page demonstrates the verification workflow and result structure. Case validation is attached when benchmark or test evidence is available for the specific geometry and operating state.
Start with the candidate and the verification question.
AURA selects the state; the CFD pilot resolves the field detail.