AURA Engineering Platform
Breshev Engineering · Services

Engineering evidence reviews for precision and rotor-bearing systems.

Breshev Engineering helps engineering teams reduce technical risk before design freeze, prototype testing, or production release — through independent, fixed-scope evidence reviews built on the same discipline as the AURA Engineering Platform.

Request a scoped review View review services

Typical starting engagement: €1,900–€4,900 review package.

Calculation completed does not mean decision ready.

Most advanced hardware teams can generate calculations, simulations, CAD models, FEM results, and test data. The harder question is different: is the evidence strong enough to make the engineering decision? Which assumptions are proven, which calculations are only screening-level, which risks remain open, what must be tested before release — and where the engineering claims exceed the available evidence.

We do not replace your engineering team. We strengthen the decision layer.

Review services

Core niche · rotor-bearing systems

Balancing Evidence Review

A focused review of balancing evidence for one high-speed rotor: tolerance-plane allocation, correction mapping, machine/process capability, vector repeatability, component-vs-assembly transfer, modal sensitivity, and what the residual imbalance number is allowed to prove.

For: spindle and rotor-bearing teams, vibration and dynamic-response concerns, balancing claims that need independent review.
€1,900
fixed · 5–7 working days
Core niche · precision machinery

Engineering Evidence Review

Independent review of technical assumptions, calculation logic, model evidence, physical plausibility, and decision readiness — for one defined engineering decision.

For: R&D teams before key design decisions, engineering managers needing an external technical check, teams with calculations but unclear decision confidence.
€2,900–€4,900
1–2 weeks
Core niche · release decisions

Design Freeze Readiness Review

Assessment of whether a design has enough engineering evidence to move toward freeze, prototype testing, or production release — with a missing-evidence list and explicit release boundary.

For: prototype-to-production transitions, freeze decisions on high-risk mechanical systems, teams preparing for internal or external technical review.
€5,000–€12,000
2–4 weeks
Beyond the immediate niche

R&D Validation Workflow

Development of a structured, decision-gated engineering workflow connecting design, calculation, testing, documentation, and release decisions — with templates, acceptance criteria, and a freeze checklist your team keeps.

For: growing R&D and hardware teams scaling from founder-led development to structured engineering; teams with fragmented CAD / CAE / testing / release logic.
€12,000–€30,000
1–2 months
Beyond the immediate niche

Fractional Engineering Systems Advisor

Senior external advisory for complex engineering decisions: technical board participation, design review support, validation planning, decision-gate setup, and mentoring of senior engineers.

For: CTOs, founders, and heads of engineering without enough senior validation leadership internally.
€4,000–€12,000
monthly · by involvement level

A structured review process, not open-ended consulting.

STEP 1Technical contextYou describe the engineering problem, available evidence, design state, and the decision to be made.
STEP 2Scope definitionWe define what is reviewed, what is excluded, what inputs are needed, and what decision boundary is realistic.
STEP 3Evidence reviewAssumptions, calculation logic, model evidence, physical plausibility, and technical risks.
STEP 4Decision matrixThe case is classified with a decision-oriented structure.
STEP 5Final reportA concise engineering report: evidence status, risks, recommendations, next steps.
PASS REVIEW HOLD TEST REQUIRED

Scoped review packages

ServiceDurationTypical outputStarting fee
Balancing Evidence Review5–7 working daysEvidence map + boundary statement€1,900
Engineering Evidence Review1–2 weeksEvidence matrix + risk report€2,900–€4,900
Design Freeze Readiness Review2–4 weeksFreeze readiness report€5,000–€12,000
R&D Validation Workflow1–2 monthsWorkflow + templates€12,000–€30,000
Fractional Engineering Systems AdvisorMonthlyAdvisory / review board€4,000–€12,000/mo

Final pricing depends on technical complexity, available documentation, urgency, confidentiality requirements, and review depth. Every engagement starts with a scoped boundary — we do not begin open-ended consulting without defining the decision, the evidence, the expected output, and the exclusions.

Built on the same discipline as AURA.

Breshev Engineering is founded by Oleksii Breshev, a mechanical and R&D engineer with approximately 18 years of experience in complex mechanical systems, precision engineering, gas-static and aerostatic bearing systems, rotor dynamics, and validation workflows. The company develops the AURA Engineering Platform — professional engineering software for direct bearing calculation, inverse parameter synthesis, spindle and rotor configuration, rotor-dynamic analysis, and release evidence. These separate review services apply the same evidence discipline without reducing AURA itself to a review product.

Related reading: Technical Notes 01–05 · Release evidence · Public validation registry

Confidentiality and IP boundaries

Breshev Engineering works under NDA when required. For every engagement, the scope separates: client confidential data, client project-specific results, Breshev Engineering background IP, AURA Engineering Platform methods and pre-existing work, public technical materials, and deliverables created specifically for the client. This protects both sides and keeps the review process clear and legally manageable.

Need an independent engineering review before the next decision?

Send a short description of your engineering problem, current design stage, available calculations, and the decision you need to make. We respond with a proposed review scope, required inputs, timeline, and fee range.

These reviews are independent engineering assessments, not certifications, and do not replace the client organisation's own release authority. Reviews draw on the published AURA evidence-gate methodology and do not require disclosure of the proprietary engineering engine.